Pages in the Analysis Phase:

Related Resources

Learning Environment Design Framework
Instructional Design Toolkit

ISD Concept Map
ISD Concept Map

Bridging the performance gap

Bridging the Performance Gap

Determining Business Needs in Instructional System Design


Start with the End in Mind

To ensure you capture the business outcome or linkage, begin with the end in mind — a learning or performance initiative should be a means to an end. Thus, learning and performance initiatives should show how they will improve the business or organization, such as increase revenue, reduce costs, or speed up a process. For example, training salespeople in order to reduce the percentage that fail to make sales will both increase revenue through more sales and reduce turnover costs.

Mapping the pathway of a good training and development program would look something like this (Wick, Pollock, Jefferson, Flanagan, 2006):

Successful training and development → More effective and efficient performance → Improved business outcomes.

Since the flow of causality of the above pathway is from left to right, training must be planned in the opposite direction:

Desired business outcome → Required changes in performance to produce business outcome→ Experiences and learnings needed to produce the desired performance.

Thus, designing a viable learning program should proceed in a manner similar to this:

  1. Analysis Phase: Determine the business outcome — How does it link to the business unit(s)?
  2. Design Phase: Determine required changes in the learner's performance.
  3. Development Phase: Create the experiences that will change the learner's performance.

Impact Mapping

“Impact Mapping” is a tool developed by Robert Brinkerhoff and Stephen Gill (1994) to ensure linkage between learning initiatives and business objectives. An Impact Map has three core elements: capability, performance, and results.

If we learn how to do something, we have the capability to perform in a new way. For value to occur, we have to change our behavior and use the new capability in performance. Further, our performance must be aimed at worthwhile results — Brinkerhoff and Apking.

Part of an impact map for Customer Service Reps might look like this:

Brinkerhoff Impact Map

Backwards Planning

The Impact Map shown above can be used in conjunction with the Backwards Planning model that was introduced in the Introduction to Analysis section. In this step, Determining Business Needs or Outcome, the desired result or objective is spelled out in detail and agreed upon by both the Business Unit and the Learning/Training Department. The next step in the Analysis Phase will identify the performance (Behavior) that is needed to obtain this objective:

Backwards Planning Model

Customer Understanding and Agreement

To reach a common understanding of the required outcomes between the training team and line leaders, you should define the following activities and ensure you customer understands and agrees to them:

Learning initiatives should always be undertaken to improve the performance of the business, thus they should always be defined in business terms. An ROI (Return On Investment) is not normally required, and in some cases is not even cost-effective; however there should always be a clear causal link.

For example, frequent feedback to subordinates is normally considered a means for promoting better performance, which should equate to higher profits. Thus “the students will learn feedback skills” is NOT a business outcome as it does not relate to a verifiable outcome. A better business outcome would be “the learner's subordinates receive more frequent and better feedback” as a result of the learning initiative. The first outcome only told us what will be learned, while this outcome gave us a result than can be measured and verified.

The Business Outcome or Business Linkage should be one of the first things to determine during the analysis phase. However, to fully understand it, you might have to perform several of the other steps in the analysis phase. In any case, it must be spelled out by the end of the analysis phase as this will determine if a learning or training platform is required.

Next Steps

Go to the next section: Performance Analysis

Return to the Table of Contents

Analysis Templates (contains several analysis templates)


Brinkerhoff, R., Gill, S. (1994). The Learning Alliance: Systems Thinking in Human Resource Development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Garnevale, A., Gainer, L., Villet, J. (1990). Training in America: The Organization and Strategic Role of Training. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Trolley, E. (2006). Lies About Learning. Larry Israelite, ed. Baltimore, Maryland: ASTD.

Wick, C., Pollock, R., Jefferson, A., Flanagan, R. (2006). Six Disciplines of Breakthrough Learning: How to Turn Training and Development Into Business Results. San Francisco: Pfeiffer