Note: This site is moving to KnowledgeJump.com. Please reset your bookmark.
Training Room Design Seating Arrangements
Even if the activities of the learning session do not require changing the seating rearrangements, there are several reasons to do so:
- Learners are given a new perspective on the activity by sitting in a different part of the room.
- They get better acquainted with their peers.
- Learners are not consistently punished by being at greater distances from the screen or speakers.
- Small cliques do not arise—there is nothing wrong with cliques but in some cases they can become a problem by forcing their norms or agendas upon the entire group.
The following seating designs list some of the pros and cons of different learning rooms (Laird, 1985).
Note: In the following seating arrangements, 0 = the learners, x = the trainer, and -- equals a table.
Traditional Seating
x O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
- Best used for short lectures to large groups
- Communication tends to be one way
- Trainer cannot see the learners in the back
Modified Traditional
X O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
- There is more participation
- Allows the trainer to see all the learners
- Reduces space between trainer and learners as trainer can move up aisle
- Best used for short lectures to large groups
Horseshoe
X O O O O O O O O O O O
- Non-verbally encourages participation by allowing eye contact between the trainer and all the learners
- The trainer is able to move closer to each learner
- Works well when all learners must be able to see a demonstration
- Works good when learners will be involved in large group discussions
Modular
O O ---- ---- ---- O | | O | |O O | | O O | | O | |O | | O ---- ---- ---- 0 X ---- ---- O | |O O | | O O | | O | | O ---- ---- O
- Learners can work in small groups on exercises and projects
- Communication between trainer and learners is more difficult
- Trainer must move between groups during lectures and activities
- Good for courses that require a lot of group work
Circle
O O O X O O O O O O O O
- Most democratic and unencumbered with no status symbol
- With no table each person is "totally revealed"
- Subtle nonverbal communications are possible
- Good for T-groups and sensitivity training
- There will be conversations, shorter inputs, and more members will participate when they sit at a round table rather than at a square table
Square
Solid Hole in middle O O O O O X O O ---------- ---------- O | | O O | ------ | O O | | O O | | | | O O | | O O | | | | O O | | X O | ------ | O ---------- ---------- O O O O O O O O
- More formality than a circle
- Nobody can see all the faces of the other participants
- Depending where visual aids are placed, one side may become the "head of the table"
- A solid table normally encourages more conversation
- Tables with a hole in the middle tends to make some people less talkative, while encouraging others to speak for longer periods of time
Rectangle
O O O O O ---------------- O | | O O | | O ---------------- O O x O O
- The seats at the short dimensions of the table are often seen as leadership positions
- If used, the learners should be forced to take distinctly different positions every now and then (i.e. randomly shift the name cards)
- Fewer people can communicate face-to-face
Scatter-Shot
O O x O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
- May appear haphazard but good for experiential training
- Permits quick change of learner focus
- Produces tremendous investments of learner energy
- Works well with multiple role plays
- Learners can quickly form into large groups
- Bad for note taking
Next Step
Return to the Media, Strategies, & Methods page
Reference
Laird, Dugan (1985). Approaches To Training And Development. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.